Palabras clave: Evaluación de credibilidad; discapacidad intelectual; criterios de .. La prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio. la pericial psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio. En un estudio de archivo, . las técnicas tradicionales de evaluación psicológica que son totalmente. A.L. ManzaneroProcedimientos de evaluación de la credibilidad de las MuñozLa prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio: Reflexiones.
|Published (Last):||5 December 2004|
|PDF File Size:||10.56 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.19 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The child sexual abuse accomodation syndrome. In that study, in contrast to this one, the two types of statements could be distinguished with a Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11 1 As a way to appreciate the differences between the two types of statements, with all the measurements analyzed taken into consideration, the data was represented graphically through a high-dimensional visualization HDV technique used in testimonip studies Buja et al.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, Verbal Lie Detection Tools: Law and human behavior, 33 2 In addition, the persons with ID who belonged to the false statement group were told explicitly that they had the option to lie and were assured there would be no negative consequences if they did so, thereby preventing undue tension.
The development of statement reality analysis.
The only criteria that proved to be significant for discriminating between the two types of statements were the amount of details and the length of spontaneous statements obtained through free recall.
Graphic representation using high-dimensional visualization HDV with all criteria taken into consideration shows that the two types of statements are quite heterogeneous.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
The hope was that similar results would be obtained in this study. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17 2 Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, Conclusions As noted in the introduction, there is an abundance of literature that points out inconsistencies in the attributes differentiating true statements from false statements, as well as the irrelevance of Credibikidad procedure criteria, on the whole, for distinguishing between true and false statements.
Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, Psychology, Crime and Law, 11 1 The same instructions were given for all interviews conducted: Recent developments in statement analysis. It would be advisable to conduct further research with different events and different types of fabrication so that the results could be generalized. Data Visualization with Multidimensional Scaling.
Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, ecaluacion Effects of preparation on internal and external memories. Journal of Psychology, As noted in the introduction, there is an abundance of literature that points out inconsistencies in the attributes differentiating true statements from false statements, as well as the irrelevance of RM procedure criteria, on the whole, for distinguishing between true and false statements.
In conclusion, in light of our results, we may affirm that there are complexities involved in analyzing the credibility of testimony given by an adult person with ID and, even beyond that, in designing the supportive procedures required to credibipidad a valid testimony.
Evaluacion Pericial by Pamela Alvarez on Prezi
Facial Action Coding System: Of the 15 criteria analyzed, however, there were two amount of detail and length that were significant for discriminating between the two types of statements and, therefore, could be of some help in distinguishing the origin of the statements.
Research on persons evaluxcion ID would have to be expanded to crefibilidad other types of statements, such as those arising from false memories or those originating in the imagination. From phenotypes to etiologies pp. The language of deceit: Sexual abuse and exploitation of children and adults with mental retardation and other handicaps.
Objects, Motions and Paths: Given the bias that may condition our intuitive credibility evaluation in persons with ID, and because such an evaluation carries a significant margin of error, it is absolutely essential that, in a law enforcement or legal setting, individuals who specialize in ID would be on hand when the testimony of a person with ID is to be evaluated.
Should I believe this? Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity.